
“The legend
ends.”
Spoiler
alert: this is a story analysis
website, likely to reveal major plot points... proceed with caution!
* * * * *
There are so
many good things to say about The Dark
Knight Rises. It was a truly exceptional film, and yet... it seemed to be
lacking that extra little bit of greatness, didn’t it? What was missing? After careful
consideration, I think I may have figured out what this film needed. It was
tricky, and here’s the reason why: the director, Christopher Nolan (who was
also one of the writers), made some very good choices. But they may not have
been the best choices. That’s the
writer’s goal: make the best choices
possible.
Before we get
to those choices, let’s talk praise. Nolan’s films are often technical marvels.
This was no exception. (I only had one technical qualm with this film, but more
on that later.) The new Catwoman was a pleasant surprise, and Bane was
certainly an antagonistic force to be reckoned with. The stakes were higher in
almost every way, resulting in a spectacular climax and a very fulfilling
resolution to the Batman trilogy as a
whole. This will most likely be The Dark
Knight Rises’ most memorable aspect.
Now, on to
the choices: the first involves the ‘plot twist’ of introducing Talia as the real bad guy behind the scenes. I am
aware of her importance in the original comic book series... but honestly, what
did this do for the story? I feel that it greatly weakened the character and
role of Bane. By suddenly introducing him as the henchman only (of a far less intimidating villain), it also
brought into question his motivation. And I have to say, being the caliber of
villain that he was, Bane’s death sure seemed... anticlimactic.
The other
choices involve the story’s subplots. Whenever a film’s pacing seems to drag,
it is often the result of not working your subplots as well as you could be. In
the case of The Dark Knight Rises, I
think there were just too many
subplots. One way to fix this is by removing some of the more unnecessary
characters. (Like deputy commissioner Foley... he really didn’t do anything for
the story.) This makes for a much tighter film, and frees up time for more
important characters. (Also, my only technical qualm: you won’t have to try and
liven the pace with incredibly loud drums that smother some of the dialog.)
Now, I’ll be
the first to readily admit that these suggestions might not be the best choices... but I do think they are
stronger. Instead of having Bane as the henchman, why not make it Talia? Imagine
Bane using her as the final weapon
against Bruce Wayne—how ingenious would his plot have been then? The other one
has to do with Foley’s hatred of Batman. Why not remove Foley and give that arc
to Robin? Then he would have come full circle, from hating the Dark Knight to
becoming the Dark Knight. It would have also given Batman a chance to come full
circle, and truly be the mentor to his chosen successor.
Overall,
this was a remarkable finish to Nolan’s Batman trilogy, but it could have used
a few tweaks.

No comments:
Post a Comment